
<?xml version="1.0"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/css" href="http://w.cidesa.com.ve/skins/common/feed.css?270"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xml:lang="es">
		<id>http://w.cidesa.com.ve/index.php?feed=atom&amp;target=ArmandoL85&amp;title=Especial%3AContribuciones%2FArmandoL85</id>
		<title>CidesaWiki - Contribuciones del usuario [es]</title>
		<link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://w.cidesa.com.ve/index.php?feed=atom&amp;target=ArmandoL85&amp;title=Especial%3AContribuciones%2FArmandoL85"/>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://w.cidesa.com.ve/index.php/Especial:Contribuciones/ArmandoL85"/>
		<updated>2026-11-10T14:48:53Z</updated>
		<subtitle>De CidesaWiki</subtitle>
		<generator>MediaWiki 1.16.2</generator>

	<entry>
		<id>http://w.cidesa.com.ve/index.php/Buzz_Junior:_RoboJam</id>
		<title>Buzz Junior: RoboJam</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://w.cidesa.com.ve/index.php/Buzz_Junior:_RoboJam"/>
				<updated>2019-12-31T04:41:51Z</updated>
		
		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;ArmandoL85: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;id=&amp;quot;cnetReview&amp;quot; section=&amp;quot;rvwBody&amp;quot; data-component=&amp;quot;indepthReview&amp;quot;&amp;gt; &amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;Buzz! Junior: RoboJam is the second edition of the Buzz franchise aimed at kids. Instead of the monkeys from Buzz! Junior: Jungle Party, players this time appear as robots that inhabit a futuristic, space age world heavy with rivets, gears and jet packs.&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;View full gallery Click to enlarge Your yellow, blue, green or orange robot can be named and kitted out with the head and body shape of your choice. Once play begins, you have your pick of 25 different mini games. Most suitable for those between the age of six to 10, the games do not require knowledge of trivia, but rather quick reflexes, as most involve some type of bashing, smashing or racing (using the coloured buttons on the Buzz controllers, of course). The game names are indicative: Barrel Bashing, Mad Mallets, Pillow Fight, Saucer Shoot-out, Astro Blaster, Piston Peril and Go Nuts are some of the best examples. &amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;You can choose to play a Short (five different games), Medium (10 games) Long (15 games) or Marathon (all) session. You'll find that some mini games are more fun than others and unfortunately, you can't exit ones you don't like. The good news is, once you've discovered what your favourite games are, you can save them in a customised playlist, so you can easily return and  [http://www.phishtank.com/ http://www.phishtank.com/] play just the games you like.&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;One of the biggest differences in Buzz! Junior: RoboJam is that it works much better for fewer than four players than the previous edition. The game is easily playable with one to three players, as the &amp;quot;spare&amp;quot; robot(s) still participate, controlled through artificial intelligence in the game itself. This does extend the playability of this version of Buzz Junior, as you don't need a crowd to play it -- even a sick child home from school could play against three robot friends. The only downside we can report (from first hand experience), is that it's slightly demoralising to get beaten consistently by one of the AI players.&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;Unlike adult versions of Buzz, where good players can rack up points totals hundreds higher than their adversaries, the points awarded after each mini game in Buzz Junior range only from one to four, so the competition usually does not become too unbalanced.&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;But enough of an adult's perspective; watch our video to see what kids think of Buzz! Junior: RoboJam. Our guest reviewers -- Grace Craig, eight, Iwan Freed, nine, John Chapman, 10 and Lachlan Fuller, 10 -- played the game on a wet and cold winter afternoon. Two of them had a PS2 at their house, two did not, but after a couple of hours engrossed at the Buzz controllers, all were RoboJam fans.&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;We tried to more or less follow our Good, Bad, Bottom Line format when we asked the kids what they thought of the game. This fell down, though, when the kids really couldn't come up with much that they didn't like about RoboJam. We can't bring ourselves to rate it a perfect 10, but based on the collective thumbs up from our age-appropriate experts, we're giving it an Editors' Choice 9.5.&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>ArmandoL85</name></author>	</entry>

	<entry>
		<id>http://w.cidesa.com.ve/index.php/Creative_Sound_Blaster_Jam_Review:_50_USD_Bluetooth_Headphone_Looks_Cheap_But_Sounds_Good</id>
		<title>Creative Sound Blaster Jam Review: 50 USD Bluetooth Headphone Looks Cheap But Sounds Good</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://w.cidesa.com.ve/index.php/Creative_Sound_Blaster_Jam_Review:_50_USD_Bluetooth_Headphone_Looks_Cheap_But_Sounds_Good"/>
				<updated>2019-12-24T15:13:29Z</updated>
		
		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;ArmandoL85: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;id=&amp;quot;cnetReview&amp;quot; section=&amp;quot;rvwBody&amp;quot; data-component=&amp;quot;indepthReview&amp;quot;&amp;gt; Until recently, it was hard to find Bluetooth headphones that sounded decent for  Visual.ly ([https://visual.ly/users/jt123123/portfolio visual.ly]) less than $100. But that's changing as higher grade chips and components get cheaper. &amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;Case in point: The Creative Sound Blaster Jam, a $50 (£40, AU$70) Bluetooth headphone that's lightweight, relatively comfortable to wear and sounds good, particularly for its modest price.&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;View full gallery The Sound Blaster Jam's design is basic but endearingly retro. Sarah Tew/CNET True to its budget roots, the Sound Blaster Jam has a pretty no-frills design; in fact, it looks a little like the headphones that came with the Walkman back in the 80s. But there is something endearing about its throwback design.&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;On the downside, not everybody likes an on-ear design, and the dearth of padding on the top of the headband may bother some. They also don't fold up in any way. And while they seem to sturdy enough, I can't predict how well they'll hold up over time.&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;That said, they're lightweight and should fit most people pretty well.&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;As far as features go, there's a pause/play button that doubles as an answer/end button for cell phone calls. The requisite volume controls are on board, and when you hold those buttons down they turn into transport controls, allowing you to advance tracks forward and back. You also get a bass boost button that does just that: boosts the bass a little while sacrificing a little clarity.&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;Last but not least, there's NFC tap-to-pair technology for devices like the Samsung Galaxy phones that support it. Otherwise, it'll pair with any Bluetooth-enabled phone or audio source (including the iPhone) when you hold down the pairing button.&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;View full gallery What you get in the box. Sarah Tew/CNET Continue to next page 01&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;02&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>ArmandoL85</name></author>	</entry>

	</feed>