Subverting The Three R’s: Reading Writing Freedom

De CidesaWiki

One interpretation of the best way Islam challenges notions of modernity is through the infamous ‘clash of civilisations’ concept which posits that Islam is essentially ‘incompatible’ with the ideas of the West and this should precipitate a clash. To me, it seems apparent that Islam and ideals of the West have frequent aspirations, factors of commonality rooted in the reality that we are all human. However, the Islamic path is a path which generates deep critiques of modernity. The Western thoughts by means of its particular training is afraid of such critiques and refuses to think about that such critiques have legitimacy and are straight applicable to our lives immediately. Rather the speak is of conformity, of ‘is Islam incompatible with democracy? ’ and to talk in terms of conformity is to betray a certain imperialistic hubris, a sure fear and a failure of imagination. I ponder if we are able to overcome our worry and have the courage to be hospitable to much-wanted critiques?

This time was for me an try at adapting myself, to conform and seek answers within the perceived ‘success’ of a modernist life-style via applying modernist options. One good example of a ‘modernist’ solution is know-how. In our societies right now the thought of expertise as a universal panacea has an element of solidity and magic about it. Recently I read a set of articles written by scientists and technologists across the September eleven bombing. I used to be flabbergasted to learn eminent scientists suggesting purely technical responses, comparable to installing remote management methods on planes, as a solution to terrorism. Similarly, the quantity of consideration given to the problem of the ‘digital divide’ and ‘social inclusion’ is symptomatic of a craving for relatively easy and ‘rational’ options. Throughout the event world, one can find effectively-meaning (but unimaginative) professionals shouting about how we must present computers to the poor and needy and so bridge the hole between the haves and the have-nots. But we fail to ask ourselves what it is we’re together with the ‘poor’ and the ‘needy’ into. In an incident at work considered one of my colleagues approached me with a request for some kind of tracking device.

We had long discussions about what the device would seem like, how lengthy it will take to build and so on. In the middle of the method somebody requested what number of items this new system had to track. Nobody knew the answer. Upon investigation we found that it was only two items — a task that may have taken someone 30 minutes a month. Yet we had been properly on our method to designing a complex, costly system that will take many months to construct, in order to ‘solve’ this downside. Evidently that the system was never built and no one is worse off for that. Professionally, incidents like this taught me to challenge individuals after they requested a technical resolution. All too usually I found that there is a simple, common-sense reply that works much better and 统计代写 doesn’t require the design and construct of a technical system.

Once the initial pleasure of the transfer had subsided this offered an issue. Fortunately, the answer introduced itself at the identical time. The home we moved into had a wonderful library with books that had as soon as belonged to youngsters who had long since grown up and moved away. In addition to the library at residence, I discovered Amar Chitra Katha comic books, which provided me with an unparalleled and stress-free alternative introduction to Indian historical past and mythology. I can still remember studying an account of the Jallianwala Bagh Massacre in a comedian and being amazed at studying the British version of occasions in my faculty text books. While being annoyed at the best way Indian freedom fighters were handled (or just unnoticed) by my British textbooks, these observations didn’t prompt any great questions in my very young head. They nonetheless alerted me to, and ensured that I was snug with, a number of realities, and to the notion that perhaps issues weren't as they all the time seemed, that there is normally one other story.